The following is an excerpt from a book about suffering written by Timothy Downing, Missionary in Ecuador. The book is titled: The Storm Will ComeBuilding Foundations for Inevitable Suffering
The Moral Discernment of Suffering’s Purpose
The third pillar of endurance requires perhaps the most sophisticated form of spiritual discernment: the ability to distinguish between suffering that serves constructive purposes and suffering that merely destroys. This distinction addresses one of the most persistent challenges in Christian thinking about affliction—the tendency to treat all forms of difficulty as either inherently valuable or uniformly meaningless, rather than exercising the moral wisdom necessary to evaluate suffering’s role in particular circumstances.
The theological foundation for this distinction lies in the recognition that while suffering entered the world through sin and will be eliminated in the final restoration, God’s providence can employ even fallen realities to serve redemptive purposes. This does not mean that all suffering serves such purposes or that we should seek suffering for its own sake, but it does mean that spiritual maturity requires learning to cooperate with suffering that contributes to our formation while resisting suffering that merely degrades or destroys.
The scriptural warrant for this understanding comes from multiple sources, but perhaps most clearly from the letter to the Hebrews: “It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? If you are left without discipline, in which all have participated, then you are illegitimate children and not sons” (Hebrews 12:7-8). This passage establishes the principle that some forms of suffering serve disciplinary purposes—not punishment for wrongdoing but training for righteousness.
The author continues: “For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it” (Hebrews 12:11). This verse provides the key criterion for distinguishing productive from destructive suffering: does this difficulty contribute to the development of righteousness—conformity to Christ’s character—or does it merely inflict damage without corresponding benefit?
This criterion requires careful application. The question is not whether suffering feels pleasant (all genuine discipline involves discomfort) or whether its benefits are immediately apparent (the “peaceful fruit” often comes “later”). Rather, the question is whether the suffering in question has the potential to contribute to spiritual formation when received with proper attitudes and responses.
The businessman whose company fails despite his best efforts may experience this failure as productive pain if it leads to greater humility, deeper dependence on God, or clearer understanding of his true priorities. The same failure becomes merely destructive if it produces only bitterness, despair, or cynicism about divine providence. The difference lies not in the objective circumstances but in the individual’s response to those circumstances and his willingness to cooperate with whatever constructive purposes they might serve.
This understanding requires abandoning both the assumption that all suffering is meaningless (a view that leads to pure victimization) and the assumption that all suffering is beneficial (a view that can justify genuine cruelty or neglect). Instead, it calls for case-by-case discernment guided by scripture, tradition, reason, and the counsel of wise believers.
The Examination of Conscience Applied to Emotional Experience
The traditional practice of examination of conscience—regular reflection on one’s thoughts, words, and deeds in light of divine standards—provides a valuable framework for evaluating emotional and spiritual responses to suffering. Just as believers examine their actions to identify areas of sin and growth, they can examine their responses to difficulty to discern patterns that contribute to or hinder spiritual formation.
This examination begins with honest acknowledgment of the full range of responses that suffering produces. The believer facing significant trial typically experiences a complex mixture of emotions: fear about future outcomes, anger at circumstances or people involved, sadness about losses incurred, confusion about divine purposes, and perhaps guilt about the strength of these negative responses. The examination of conscience applied to suffering does not condemn these natural human reactions but evaluates how they are expressed and what purposes they serve.
The traditional categories of sin—pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, wrath, and sloth—provide useful diagnostic tools for this evaluation. Pride manifests in suffering through the refusal to acknowledge legitimate limitations, the assumption that we deserve exemption from difficulties that affect others, or the insistence that our understanding of justice should govern divine providence. Greed appears as excessive attachment to particular outcomes or unwillingness to accept any reduction in comfort or security. Wrath emerges as persistent resentment toward those we blame for our difficulties or rebellion against divine wisdom.
But the examination should also attend to the development of virtues—faith, hope, love, prudence, justice, temperance, and fortitude. How has this suffering contributed to deeper trust in God’s character? Has it increased compassion for others facing similar difficulties? Has it clarified priorities or strengthened resolve to pursue what truly matters? Has it produced greater patience with human limitation or deeper appreciation for divine grace?
The goal of this examination is not self-condemnation but self-understanding. The believer who recognizes that his response to unemployment has included both legitimate concern for his family’s welfare and illegitimate wounded pride can address both elements appropriately. He can take responsible action regarding his family’s needs while also acknowledging his need for greater humility and trust in divine provision.
Regular practice of this examination develops what might be called “spiritual discernment” regarding our own interior life. We learn to recognize which of our responses to difficulty serve constructive purposes and which merely perpetuate suffering without corresponding benefit. This discernment proves invaluable when facing future trials, as it enables quicker recognition of destructive patterns and more rapid movement toward constructive responses.
Investing in Future Character Through Present Discipline
One of the most important distinctions between productive and merely destructive suffering lies in the temporal orientation it encourages. Productive pain motivates investment in future character and capacity, while destructive pain traps attention in present circumstances or past grievances. The believer who learns to recognize this distinction can choose to cooperate with forms of difficulty that serve formative purposes while resisting those that merely perpetuate damage.
This investment orientation requires what might be called “eschatological perspective”—the ability to view present circumstances in light of their ultimate outcomes rather than merely their immediate effects. The athlete who endures the discomfort of training does so because she believes that present discipline will produce future capacity. The student who accepts the difficulty of challenging coursework does so because he trusts that current struggle will result in eventual knowledge and skill. The believer who embraces the discipline of spiritual formation does so because she believes that present effort will contribute to eternal character.
This perspective transforms the believer’s relationship to various forms of difficulty. The parent who chooses to have difficult conversations with his teenager about values and expectations experiences the pain of conflict as investment in future relationship and character development. The employee who accepts a demanding assignment that requires her to develop new skills experiences the stress and uncertainty as contribution to professional growth and personal capacity. The believer who chooses costly obedience over convenient compromise experiences the sacrifice as participation in divine purposes that transcend immediate personal benefit.
The key word in these examples is “chooses.” Productive pain typically involves some element of voluntary acceptance or cooperation, even when the circumstances themselves are not chosen. The individual who develops cancer has not chosen the disease, but she can choose how to respond to it. She can view the treatment process as mere ordeal to be endured or as opportunity to develop patience, gratitude, and trust in divine providence. She can allow the disease to make her bitter and self-absorbed or use it to deepen compassion for other sufferers and appreciation for previously unnoticed blessings.
This element of choice explains why identical circumstances can produce vastly different spiritual outcomes in different individuals. Two people may face the same external trials, but one emerges strengthened while the other is weakened. The difference typically lies not in the objective severity of their circumstances but in their chosen responses to those circumstances and their willingness to cooperate with whatever constructive purposes their suffering might serve.
The investment orientation also provides motivation for enduring difficulty that might otherwise seem pointless. When we understand that present pain can contribute to future character, we discover reasons for persevering through circumstances that offer no immediate relief or apparent benefit. The knowledge that we are building spiritual capital that will serve us well in future trials provides encouragement during seasons when such capital is being severely tested.
Self-Pity Versus Godly Sorrow: A Crucial Distinction
Perhaps the most important practical application of discerning productive versus destructive pain involves learning to distinguish between self-pity and what scripture calls “godly sorrow.” Both responses acknowledge real difficulty and involve genuine emotional pain, but they lead to dramatically different outcomes and serve fundamentally different purposes.
Self-pity focuses attention on the unfairness of our circumstances, the inadequacy of others’ responses to our needs, and the ways in which we have been victimized by forces beyond our control. It asks questions like “Why me?” and “How could they do this to me?” and “Don’t I deserve better than this?” These questions, while natural responses to difficulty, tend to increase rather than decrease emotional suffering because they focus on aspects of our situation that lie beyond our control and that we cannot change through our own efforts.
Self-pity also tends toward social isolation, since others typically grow weary of listening to complaints that do not lead to constructive action or positive change. The individual trapped in self-pity may find that friends and family members begin to avoid conversations about his difficulties, not because they lack compassion but because those conversations never seem to produce anything beyond repetitive rehearsal of grievances.
Godly sorrow, by contrast, acknowledges genuine difficulty while maintaining focus on how we can respond faithfully to our circumstances rather than on why we should be exempted from them. It asks questions like “What is God teaching me through this?” and “How can I use this experience to serve others?” and “What aspects of my character need development as revealed by this trial?” These questions, while often more difficult to answer than the questions posed by self-pity, tend to decrease emotional suffering over time because they focus attention on areas where we do possess some agency and capacity for positive response.
Godly sorrow also tends toward deeper community, since others are generally willing to support individuals who are working constructively to address their difficulties. The believer who acknowledges his struggles while demonstrating commitment to growth and service typically discovers that his trials become occasions for others to offer practical help, spiritual encouragement, and shared wisdom.
The distinction between these two forms of sorrow can be subtle, especially in the early stages of significant difficulty. Both may involve tears, distress, and expressions of pain. Both acknowledge that something genuinely difficult has occurred. The difference lies in their ultimate orientation: self-pity seeks primarily the alleviation of personal discomfort, while godly sorrow seeks primarily the cultivation of character and the advancement of divine purposes.
This distinction helps explain why the same individual may experience both responses to the same circumstances at different times. The woman whose marriage ends may initially respond with self-pity, focusing on her husband’s failures and the unfairness of her situation. Over time, she may develop godly sorrow, acknowledging her own contributions to the marriage’s problems and asking how she can grow through this experience to become a better person and perhaps a better partner in future relationships.
The movement from self-pity to godly sorrow rarely happens automatically or quickly. It typically requires conscious choice, community support, and the gradual development of spiritual perspective that can encompass both honest acknowledgment of difficulty and trust in divine providence. This movement represents one of the most important forms of character development that suffering can produce, and learning to facilitate this movement in ourselves and others constitutes a crucial pastoral skill.
The Biblical Framework: Divine Discipline as Sonship Evidence
The theological foundation for embracing productive pain finds its clearest expression in the biblical understanding of divine discipline. Far from being evidence of divine anger or abandonment, the experience of corrective suffering indicates our inclusion in God’s family and his commitment to our ultimate welfare. This understanding transforms our relationship to difficulty by providing a framework for interpreting trials as expressions of divine love rather than divine indifference or hostility.
The key passage is Hebrews 12:5-11, which quotes Proverbs 3:11-12 and applies it to the Christian experience: “My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor be weary when reproved by him. For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives.” The author emphasizes that divine discipline serves the same purpose as good human parenting: the development of character that will enable the child to thrive in adult life.
This comparison with human parenting provides several important insights. First, effective discipline always aims at the child’s ultimate benefit rather than the parent’s immediate satisfaction. The father who corrects his son’s dangerous behavior does so not to make himself feel better but to protect his child from harm and teach him wisdom. Similarly, divine discipline serves our formation rather than God’s emotional needs.
Second, effective discipline is proportionate to the child’s capacity and need. Wise parents do not impose the same requirements on a three-year-old and a thirteen-year-old, nor do they respond to minor infractions with major consequences. The passage suggests that God’s discipline is similarly calibrated to our particular circumstances, spiritual maturity, and developmental needs.
Third, effective discipline is temporary and purposeful rather than permanent and arbitrary. Good parents do not punish their children indefinitely or without clear connection to specific behaviors or lessons. The passage promises that divine discipline, however painful in the moment, “later yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it.”
This framework provides several practical benefits for believers facing difficult circumstances. It enables us to ask constructive questions: What might God be teaching me through this experience? How might this difficulty contribute to spiritual growth if I respond to it appropriately? What areas of character need development as revealed by this trial?
It also provides motivation for cooperation rather than resistance. If we understand that our trials may serve divine purposes for our formation, we can choose to work with those purposes rather than merely enduring the difficulty until it passes. This cooperation does not mean passive acceptance of all circumstances—sometimes the lesson involves learning to take appropriate action rather than remaining passive—but it does mean approaching trials with openness to whatever constructive purposes they might serve.
The framework also provides comfort during extended periods of difficulty. When trials seem to persist longer than we think necessary or desirable, the understanding that they may serve divine purposes for our formation helps maintain hope that they will not prove ultimately meaningless or destructive.
However, this framework requires careful application to avoid several potential distortions. First, it should not be used to justify human cruelty or neglect. The fact that God can bring good from evil circumstances does not mean that those who inflict evil should be excused or that victims should refrain from seeking justice or protection.
Second, it should not be applied to all forms of suffering indiscriminately. Not every difficulty represents divine discipline in the technical sense. Some suffering results from living in a fallen world, some from poor human choices (our own or others’), and some from natural causes that do not carry particular moral or spiritual significance.
Third, it should not be used to silence legitimate lament or questions. The same scriptures that speak of divine discipline also record extensive expressions of confusion, complaint, and request for relief from various forms of suffering. Acknowledging that trials may serve formative purposes does not mean we cannot honestly express our desire for their conclusion.
Practical Exercises for Discerning Productive Pain
The development of capacity to distinguish between productive and destructive pain requires regular practice and sustained attention. The following exercises can help believers develop this crucial form of spiritual discernment:
The Weekly Pain Audit
Each week, review the various difficulties you have experienced and attempt to categorize them according to their potential for contributing to character development. Which challenges seem to be teaching you patience, humility, trust, or other virtues? Which merely create frustration without apparent constructive purpose? Which could serve formative purposes if you responded to them differently?
This audit should be conducted with humility and openness to correction. Our initial assessments of suffering’s purpose may prove incomplete or mistaken as we gain more perspective over time. The goal is not to achieve perfect discernment immediately but to develop the habit of thoughtful reflection on suffering’s role in spiritual formation.
The Character Development Prayer
When facing particular trials, pray specifically for wisdom to understand any constructive purposes they might serve and grace to cooperate with those purposes. Ask questions like: “Lord, how might you want to use this difficulty to develop my character?” “What virtues do I need that this trial might help cultivate?” “How can I respond to this situation in ways that serve your purposes for my formation?”
This prayer should be balanced with honest expressions of desire for relief and acknowledgment of the genuine difficulty involved. The goal is not to suppress natural human reactions to suffering but to integrate those reactions with openness to divine purposes that may transcend our immediate preferences.
The Future Self Exercise
When experiencing significant difficulty, imagine how the person you hope to become might look back on this trial. What lessons might your future self thank you for learning during this season? What character development might result from responding well to current challenges? How might this suffering contribute to your capacity to help others facing similar difficulties?
This exercise helps maintain temporal perspective during trials that may seem to serve no purpose from within the immediate experience. It also provides motivation for choosing constructive responses even when such responses require more effort than simply enduring until circumstances change.
The Virtue Development Plan
Identify specific virtues that your current circumstances might help develop, then create concrete practices for cultivating those virtues through your response to present challenges. If your trial seems designed to develop patience, establish specific practices for responding patiently to daily frustrations. If it seems aimed at humility, look for opportunities to acknowledge limitations and receive help from others.
This exercise transforms passive endurance of difficulty into active cooperation with character development. It provides specific goals and measures for growth that can maintain motivation when progress seems slow or invisible.
The Community Discernment Practice
Share your reflections on suffering’s potential purposes with trusted friends, mentors, or spiritual advisors. Ask them to help you distinguish between interpretations that seem genuinely insightful and those that might represent wishful thinking or avoidance of necessary action. Invite them to point out patterns in your spiritual development that might not be visible from your individual perspective.
This practice provides the communal dimension essential for accurate spiritual discernment. Our individual perspectives on our own trials are inevitably limited and potentially distorted by self-interest, making the wisdom of mature believers an essential resource for understanding suffering’s role in spiritual formation.
The goal of all these practices is not to find artificial meaning in meaningless suffering or to avoid taking appropriate action to address changeable circumstances. Rather, it is to develop the capacity to cooperate with divine purposes that may be served through various forms of difficulty while maintaining healthy resistance to forms of suffering that merely destroy without building.
This third pillar of endurance—embracing productive pain—provides essential preparation for what follows. Without the ability to distinguish between suffering that serves formative purposes and suffering that merely damages, believers cannot make the wise choices about response and resistance that authentic spiritual maturity requires. With this discernment, they possess the wisdom necessary to invest their pain wisely rather than merely enduring it passively.
We’re delighted to share this book with you one post at a time. If you’d prefer to hold this book in your hands—there’s something beautiful about turning actual pages as you study God’s Word—you can easily order a physical copy from Amazon by simply clicking on the book image above.
